Neo-Politics

There are a plethora of words entering into politics. A couple words are neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism. The Libertarian Party states the free market will manage government without additional taxation. Government responsibility is to defend the countries borders.

These concepts are confusing to most people. Many want to place "neo-liberalism" as meaning freedom, rebellion or anarchy. Ergo, "neo-conservatism" must mean fascism or dictatorship. Neither of these definitions are accurate. These terms exist in conjunction with current values and government.

More freedom would be nice. Those who rebel against laws much handle political issues independently of Police. Free market governing is comparable to anarchy. Logically, following a civil method of honestly gaining or trading products and services should insight a informal code of ethics with mannerisms to exist peacefully. Ergo, politics to educe a sense of etiquette and morality appear to be a function of democracy.

Politicians are promoting is to reduce costs-of-business. This is not lawless. It states government overhead, because of fear, has become unbearable. It is difficult to make a profit. Without a profit businesses are unable to function or provide proof of viability or necessity.

People want government to assist with problems. A Lobbyist receives five thousand dollars to make a ten minute. People have to pay taxes in addition to making donations to organizations to hire a Lobbyist. Otherwise, they pay for what other people want. Government is everywhere.

Every time people want a new thing, there is a tax. Environmentalist identified chemicals might damage the environment. Companies have to pay a higher price to use specific products, yet are without a Lobbyist. That makes it difficult to stay in business. The average attitude states they should go out-of-business, because they want to use older methods to make products.

The internet is a new industry. There is a law to not charge taxes on internet service. This does not mean products and services sold on the internet are tax free. It is a commercial market spanning the United States. Taxes are at the discretion of Business Owners. As internet grows, companies are charging tax on services. A Company has to legitimize whether it is a business or personal expense. Products are nontaxable when bought buy a Seller to sell to another person.

People do not want to pay taxes. They do want protection from internet piracy, phishing, fraud and other illegal activities.

Who contributes to a fund that will instate these programs? It comes from taxes. Taxes should come from the people wanting to protect themselves or Online Vendors. It is caustic when people working in brick-and-mortar jobs see Online Vendors as potential enemies. Those using the internet should pay the taxes. Then there will be money going to programs to enforce laws by the people wanting laws.

Though stating a free market bias, there are several governmental structures protecting the free market. Neo-liberalism is not anarchy. It is an adjustment to the free market; wherein, the government interferes when corruption modifies peoples' ability to make decisions. There is also a reorganization of taxes. People wanting a service pay for the service.

Is clearly defining government policies by free market standards viable?

Neo-Conservatism also has a relationship to existing values and government. When people hear the word "fascist," they think of Nazi's during World War II. This is not true. Fascists uphold the existing systems of nationality and government.

What is the United States of America sense of nationality? The United States was established by Christians. There is a leaning towards Christianity in most laws and also in the Constitution. There is equal opportunity to pursue ownership of property and right to personal freedoms.

Every generation exhibits a form of rebellious activity. We want secure borders. There is an upward necessity for charity, forgiveness, understanding and individuality. We want to pursue happiness.

This made several laws and functional methods to get what we need. Rebellious activity serves as a method of defining when laws are unfair. After being identifying a solution, it is possible to petition for or against actions. We want to be an industrious country, not a underdeveloped country.

The internet would not be as advance as it is now without taxation. Infant industries have protection according to the Constitution, ergo, federal government. Minorities have protection. The many layers of advancement, popularity, organization and efficiency happen more quickly and amongst more people because of government interference and socialism.

It is possible for the internet to exist, as it does now, many years in future. Not every invention is successful. The inventions that are successful and benefit everyone are so important it was worth trying a couple odd ideas.

This is similar to protecting minority rights. Several people live a longer life, manage to earn a living or contribute to providing a resource of Capable Employees. There are a few people who do amazing things. The kind of things that no one can imagine life without. The statistical average has a skew towards mediocrity and poverty; however, charity makes social, technological and economic advancement possible.

People do not invest in obscure ideas. People do not invest in obscure people unless they believe in charity. What is or is not made could be the decision of the corporations or Wealthy. There is an inventive spirit that needs inspiration and funding to exist.

Government has become excessive. There is a need to reduce programs. It would be nice if products and services paid for themselves. Is that worth the cost of falling behind in technology?

Being against politics in the free market, it is an over-exaggeration. The free market includes politics. Since there are anti-trust laws, there are competing businesses. Do I want to go to a business with rude people or a business that treats me wonderfully?

Neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism are new. Definitions fluctuate. It is safe to assume they are both extensions of existing values, morals, laws and government.

Related Article
Conserve and Liberal